Very similar explanation of words/symphony! (Ci/symphonie extreme similarity explaine)
Hello everyone,
I'm back from a short hiatus with FF. I've received a lot of PMs about the similarity CI approach, whether I still use it and whether I can explain it in more depth.
Me explaining the concept doesn't mean I agree with what eurusdd did, which is a huge shame because some of his concepts are good and some seem flawed, but let's not dwell on what has happened and experimented.
So I would like to take this opportunity to answer these questions. No, I haven't used it recently, but when I did I made some nice profits but noticed it had flaws in trending markets. I only applied a simple logic to avoid getting stuck in a strong trend.
I don't think this is the "holy grail", but it's very useful, especially if you use a good R:R. You can apply SL ideas if you want.
Please keep the discussion clean and don't resort to stupid arguments
rule
1) The two CIs must agree to become a major trend change
2) When there is a difference in the direction of the smaller CI indicator from the main trend this is the level the price will return to
This is an important part of not being discovered
3) Valid main trend changes are only recognized when the CI is larger than the main spike (minor spike)
Note: red and green spikes are primary, achromatic spikes are secondary
CI setup example - small CI= 1-x-4
Large CI = 1-2x-4
Please do not ask for optimal settings as each broker's CI settings are different.
Attached are extreme peak indicators, if there are any encoders that can make them run more efficiently, please do so!
I'm back from a short hiatus with FF. I've received a lot of PMs about the similarity CI approach, whether I still use it and whether I can explain it in more depth.
Me explaining the concept doesn't mean I agree with what eurusdd did, which is a huge shame because some of his concepts are good and some seem flawed, but let's not dwell on what has happened and experimented.
So I would like to take this opportunity to answer these questions. No, I haven't used it recently, but when I did I made some nice profits but noticed it had flaws in trending markets. I only applied a simple logic to avoid getting stuck in a strong trend.
I don't think this is the "holy grail", but it's very useful, especially if you use a good R:R. You can apply SL ideas if you want.
Please keep the discussion clean and don't resort to stupid arguments
rule
1) The two CIs must agree to become a major trend change
2) When there is a difference in the direction of the smaller CI indicator from the main trend this is the level the price will return to
This is an important part of not being discovered
3) Valid main trend changes are only recognized when the CI is larger than the main spike (minor spike)
Note: red and green spikes are primary, achromatic spikes are secondary
CI setup example - small CI= 1-x-4
Large CI = 1-2x-4
Please do not ask for optimal settings as each broker's CI settings are different.
Attached are extreme peak indicators, if there are any encoders that can make them run more efficiently, please do so!












Attachment to original post (6)
📦 Summary of post attachments (7)
Below are all the files shared in the reply (7).
💡 Featured Recommendations
✍️ Latest by the author
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
📌 Popular topics
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
🔗 You May Be Interested In
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •
- •